You probably do. The problem isn’t the lack of reviews, it’s that they’re slow, inconsistent, and dependent on who’s in the room. Designers wait, delivery stalls, and the standard shifts from person to person. The Loops makes reviews fast, unbiased, and consistent. Expert feedback is there when your team needs it, in hours not weeks, with the same high standard every time. That keeps sprints moving and rework down.

Fair concern. Most  tools enabled by AI are generic. The Loops is different: it’s expert-informed and rubric-based. That means every review is tied to a clear standard of what “good” looks like. Where human reviews vary with the person or the mood, The Loops stays consistent. That consistency is what makes it fair.

Yes, because the expert feedback is clear, practical, and politics-free. Designers don’t get vague opinions. They get actionable expert feedback they can use right away. In early trials, designers preferred it. It was faster, direct, and easier to trust than waiting on someone’s calendar.

We get it, no one wants another step in their process. That’s why The Loops works inside the tools and process you already use. It’s not another platform to manage. It’s expert feedback delivered where your team already works.

Feedback isn’t a soft skill, it’s a business lever. Slow manager feedback costs money. McKinsey shows delays can cut revenue by up to 50%. Gartner links poor manager feedback loops to doubled project failure. Harvard ties lack of feedback to higher attrition.

The Loops turns that around. Faster delivery, stronger engagement, less rework. The return shows up in speed, retention, and results no matter who or how its created.

Yes. The Loops was built for global teams. Async, instant, and hierarchy-neutral expert feedback means no waiting for time zones to line up, no senior voice dominating the room.

Every designer, wherever they are, gets the same clear standard of expert feedback, right when they need it and in a way that resonates with them